Evaluations
Registration
All courses are conducted and
evaluated in a continuous & internal manner by the faculty who
teach these courses. The student registers for a certain number of
courses each semester; the year being divided into two semesters, and a
summer term, whenever offered. A faculty member, as registration
advisor, helps a student to draw up his programme, suitable to his pace
and needs, which is made possible by the course-wise time-table of the
Institute. Every student gets, incidentally, a training in
decision-making through (i) choice of load, i.e. number of courses per
semester to suit his pace, (ii) selection of his own time-table to suit
his convenience, and (iii) picking up courses as electives to meet his
own aspirations. It is the responsibility of the student to attend
classes regularly and to maintain a required level of scholastic
standing.
Assessment
The performance of a student in each course is assessed by the teacher
by means of continuous evaluation throughout the semester in class
work, periodical quizzes, tests (sometimes unannounced), tutorials,
laboratory work, home work, project, etc. and a comprehensive
examination at the end of the semester. The student is thereby given a
large number of opportunities to exhibit himself and be evaluated. The
system encourages and rewards continuous and systematic study. It
provides a constant feedback to the student as to where he stands, thus
enabling him to cultivate regular habits of studying/learning and
preparing himself for the future.
Unusual
methods of evaluation have been evolved in the Practice School courses
to take account of certain traits which do not surface in a classroom
education, like professional judgement, decision-making ability,
interdisciplinary approach, initiative, leadership, sense of
responsibility, etc.
Grading
The system
discards the conventional emphasis on a single final examination and
numerical marks as the only absolute indication of the quality of
student's performance. Thus, at the end of the semester the teacher of
the course awards letter grades A, B, C, D, E to the student based on
the total performance of the student and it is relative to the
performance of others taking the same course. These letter grades stand
for quality performance : A-Excellent, B-Good, C-Fair, D-Poor and
E-Exposed.
Further,
these letter grades have points associated with them in a quantified
hierarchy. There are also courses in which the teacher awards
non-letter grades which have only a qualitative hierarchy. The teacher
may also pronounce the performance of a student in a course in terms of
certain reports which should not be misconstrued as grades.
Although
BITS does not stipulate a minimum percentage of attendance before a
student is permitted to appear in any test/examination, the Institute,
being a fully residential university with internal and continuous
evaluation system, expects every student to be responsible for
regularity of his attendance in classrooms and laboratories, to appear
in scheduled tests and examinations and to fulfill all other tasks
assigned to him in every course. The system has adequate resilience to
accommodate unforeseen situations through withdrawal from a course,
make-up test, feedback from examinations and interaction with teachers.
When in spite of all these facilities a student fails to cooperate with
the teacher in the discharge of his part of the contract to such an
extent that the teacher is unable to award any grade, the teacher is
authorised to give a ?ot Cleared (NC) report.
A student is
deemed to have cleared a course if he obtains a grade in the course.
However the educational philosophy of the Institute interlinks and at
the same time distinguishes between the performance of a student in a
single course and his overall cumulative performance. The overall
performance of a student is indicated by an index known as the
?umulative Grade Point Average (CGPA). It is the weighted average of
the grade points of all the letter grades received by the student since
his entry into the Institute and is expressed on a 10-point scale.
In
the case of Integrated First Degree programmes the final division for
the degree is decided on the basis of CGPA and there are three
classifications, namely Distinction, First Division and Second
Division. However, in the case of Higher Degree and the Doctoral
programmes no division is awarded for the degree.
During the
student's stay in the Institute, the Institute expects him to show a
certain minimum performance and progress. The minimum academic
requirements regarding the performance and progress for the Integrated
First Degrees and Higher Degrees are:
- A CGPA of at
least 4.5 at the end of every semester for integrated first degree
students and 5.5 for higher degree/Ph.D. students.
- Not more than one E grade in a semester for integrated first degree programmes and no E grade in the higher degree programmes.
- The
pace of progress of a student should be such that at any stage of
reckoning he/she should not have spent more than 50% extra time than
what is prescribed for him/her upto that stage in his/her programme.